Come enjoy the Bulge!

poppypicklesticks:

equality-over-extremism:

poppypicklesticks:

theliterarywolf:

poppypicklesticks:

haunted-by-cupcakes:

paintballing-on-the-moon:

OKAY, I WAS LOOKING UP COSTUMES FOR HALLOWEEN BECAUSE, FUCK YOU, I’M EXCITED. AND THIS SHIT IS WHAT I FOUND FOR WEDNESDAY ADDAMS AND THIS IS FUCKED UP. SHE IS A CHILD FUCKING CHARACTER. WHY ARE YOU SEXUALISING THAT. SHE IS A CHILD. YOU SHOULDN’T BE SEXUALISING WOMEN’S COSTUMES ANYWAY BECAUSE THAT’S FUCKED UP BUT THE SEXUALISATION OF A CHILD FUCKING CHARACTER, THAT CROSSES THE LINE SO FAR THAT IT CIRCLES THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE AND APPEARS BACK ON EARTH. END THIS NOW.

ITS A COSTUME MADE FOR ADULTS
ITS FOR ADULTS TO WEAR
NO IS FORCING YOU TO BUY IT OR WEAR IT
WHY DO YOU EVEN GIVE A SHIT?
Did you ever stop and think that some women WANT to dress up like this?
If someone wants to dress up as the sexy-grown-up version of Wednesday
then let them

Some Women wanna buy sexy costumes
WHY?
I don’t know and I don’t care

One of my best friends has been saying she wanted a costume like this for ages!  I’m going to go tell her, she’ll be so happy, she loves Wednesday Addams. 

Fuck off OP, I would rock the living shit out of that costume if it probably didn’t cost an arm and a leg

What next?  Is she going to ban me from wearing my slutty Olive Oyl costume?  

Olive Oyl needs to check her Thin Privilege or something? 

Sure the skirt is shorter and paired up with heels on a conventionally attractive model. But these costumes don’t even look that “sexy”. The dress on the first one is cute and actually looks like something I would normally wear.

Yeah aren’t feminists going berserk on this rotten little website because they can’t dress like that to school? 

(via oppressing-all-womyns)

siryouarebeingmocked:

Maddox on the controversy over Spider-Woman’s butt.NSFW audio

Funny. When I heard about the controversy, my first thought was “isn’t that the same pose Spidey is in all the time?”

I saw an article on IO9 or something that went “if male superheroes were presented like SW” or something like that. I didn’t read it, but I have little doubt that it deliberately misrepresented the problem by putting male heroes in Speedos and putting them in exaggeratedly sexy poses that only vaguely resemble those Jessica here is in, in the name of “satire”.

I am basing this assumption solely on the fact that it was IO9.

siryouarebeingmocked:

ironicplanecrashes:

siryouarebeingmocked:

warriorqueenboudica:

siryouarebeingmocked:

gsxp:

mjforloveandjustice:

abunchofassholes:

larousseradicale:

tsunamiwavesurfing:

everything in life is a trap, pour one out for him #RIP

I hate this because this is actually another example of women’s and lesbians’ oppression. Many lesbian parents who get into a bad financial situation (no matter how temporary) are forced to contact their donor for support even if they don’t want to or there was a contract because the government makes them do that before they are approved for any kind of government assistance for your child. Maybe if they gave both moms parental rights things like this wouldn’t happen. Blame the government not the parents.
Also it wouldn’t surprise me if they paid him to be a donor and he did it without knowing what he was doing in order to reap his own benefits. Do not feel sorry for him one bit.

So basically this dude is being forced to pay large sums of money for a kid that he has no parental rights to and you’re making this about women. Really.
Why do you have to make other peoples’ problems all about women? Why do you feel the need to constantly reframe everything so you look like the victim in every possible situation?

It’s actually pretty disgusting that you’re using this poor guy’s plight as a platform for how oppressed women are, because of course EVERYTHING is misogyny if you squint at it.
Sperm donors usually have no parental rights to their children and are usually just there to provide the ingredients. Unless these women are willing to give him full parental rights, he shouldn’t have to owe them a dime.
~Mod Silvermoon424

"What? A man is LITERALLY being oppressed?This must be another example of how WOMEN are FIGURATIVELY being oppressed!”


http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article337100/Judge-rules-that-Kansan-who-provided-sperm-to-lesbian-couple-owes-child-support.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kansas-judge-man-who-provided-sperm-to-lesbian-couple-must-pay-child-support/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10595447/Sperm-donor-must-pay-child-support-to-lesbian-couple-court-rules.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/23/justice/kansas-sperm-donation/

Except this isn’t a case of a man being oppressed at all and the ruling is absolutely correct under the law.
Kansas law requires that for a man making a sperm donation to waive his parental rights, he must go through a licensed physician, otherwise he’s liable for any children that result, even if he signs a contract that waives his parental rights. This ensures that nasties such as STD’s, underlying genetic conditions, etc. don’t get unwittingly passed to a future child that the couple with the baby are now on the hook for, or that the couple tries to sue a donor for a health condition the baby has that may or may not have come from him. It’s a GOOD thing to require a health check up on both parties before before strangers start making babies with one another.
The ruling happened because the arrangement for the sperm donation was done via Craigslist and not through a proper medical clinic, and at no point was a physician brought in to assess the health of the biological mother and father prior to conception.
If the lesbian couple knew they could eventually sue for child support before they received his sperm, they’re assholes and he might have a case for suing them for theft of body fluids or something since it wasn’t an official donation. I’m not sure how that would work or whether he would have a case at all.
If they didn’t know about it beforehand and some doctor or lawyer told them that they could sue for child support, they are well within their rights to get child support according to Kansas law. The man should have checked up on the law and made sure of exactly what he was getting into before he agreed to father a child, regardless of whether he wanted anything to do with that child.
If they had gone into a clinic and gotten a physician to sign off on the artificial insemination, they would have no case whatsoever to get money from him. This is why you go through professionals for this sort of transaction and not through fucking Craigslist.

My incredulous image macro was about someone trying to make this about the two women being oppressed. I also provided several sources for the story, didya notice?

so because it’s within the limits of the law, the couple suing him aren’t assholes and it’s his fault? 
:/ 
And the couple are just victims that had no choice but to sue their donor because they might not have been able to get government assistance? 

http://equality-activist-atheist-woman.tumblr.com/post/98493005985/poppypicklesticks-abunchofassholes
Apparently they split up and the other mom has no parental rights. And, thus, no responsibility to pay child support. 

siryouarebeingmocked:

ironicplanecrashes:

siryouarebeingmocked:

warriorqueenboudica:

siryouarebeingmocked:

gsxp:

mjforloveandjustice:

abunchofassholes:

larousseradicale:

tsunamiwavesurfing:

everything in life is a trap, pour one out for him #RIP

I hate this because this is actually another example of women’s and lesbians’ oppression. Many lesbian parents who get into a bad financial situation (no matter how temporary) are forced to contact their donor for support even if they don’t want to or there was a contract because the government makes them do that before they are approved for any kind of government assistance for your child. Maybe if they gave both moms parental rights things like this wouldn’t happen. Blame the government not the parents.

Also it wouldn’t surprise me if they paid him to be a donor and he did it without knowing what he was doing in order to reap his own benefits. Do not feel sorry for him one bit.

So basically this dude is being forced to pay large sums of money for a kid that he has no parental rights to and you’re making this about women. Really.

Why do you have to make other peoples’ problems all about women? Why do you feel the need to constantly reframe everything so you look like the victim in every possible situation?

It’s actually pretty disgusting that you’re using this poor guy’s plight as a platform for how oppressed women are, because of course EVERYTHING is misogyny if you squint at it.

Sperm donors usually have no parental rights to their children and are usually just there to provide the ingredients. Unless these women are willing to give him full parental rights, he shouldn’t have to owe them a dime.

~Mod Silvermoon424

"What? A man is LITERALLY being oppressed?
This must be another example of how WOMEN are FIGURATIVELY being oppressed!”

http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article337100/Judge-rules-that-Kansan-who-provided-sperm-to-lesbian-couple-owes-child-support.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kansas-judge-man-who-provided-sperm-to-lesbian-couple-must-pay-child-support/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10595447/Sperm-donor-must-pay-child-support-to-lesbian-couple-court-rules.html

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/23/justice/kansas-sperm-donation/

Except this isn’t a case of a man being oppressed at all and the ruling is absolutely correct under the law.

Kansas law requires that for a man making a sperm donation to waive his parental rights, he must go through a licensed physician, otherwise he’s liable for any children that result, even if he signs a contract that waives his parental rights. This ensures that nasties such as STD’s, underlying genetic conditions, etc. don’t get unwittingly passed to a future child that the couple with the baby are now on the hook for, or that the couple tries to sue a donor for a health condition the baby has that may or may not have come from him. It’s a GOOD thing to require a health check up on both parties before before strangers start making babies with one another.

The ruling happened because the arrangement for the sperm donation was done via Craigslist and not through a proper medical clinic, and at no point was a physician brought in to assess the health of the biological mother and father prior to conception.

If the lesbian couple knew they could eventually sue for child support before they received his sperm, they’re assholes and he might have a case for suing them for theft of body fluids or something since it wasn’t an official donation. I’m not sure how that would work or whether he would have a case at all.

If they didn’t know about it beforehand and some doctor or lawyer told them that they could sue for child support, they are well within their rights to get child support according to Kansas law. The man should have checked up on the law and made sure of exactly what he was getting into before he agreed to father a child, regardless of whether he wanted anything to do with that child.

If they had gone into a clinic and gotten a physician to sign off on the artificial insemination, they would have no case whatsoever to get money from him. This is why you go through professionals for this sort of transaction and not through fucking Craigslist.

My incredulous image macro was about someone trying to make this about the two women being oppressed. I also provided several sources for the story, didya notice?

so because it’s within the limits of the law, the couple suing him aren’t assholes and it’s his fault? 

:/ 

And the couple are just victims that had no choice but to sue their donor because they might not have been able to get government assistance? 

http://equality-activist-atheist-woman.tumblr.com/post/98493005985/poppypicklesticks-abunchofassholes

Apparently they split up and the other mom has no parental rights. And, thus, no responsibility to pay child support. 

siryouarebeingmocked:

anti-feminist-rayquaza:

Lol!

"so only women should have to protect themselves? that’s victim blaming"
"Wh-what?”

siryouarebeingmocked:

anti-feminist-rayquaza:

Lol!

"so only women should have to protect themselves? that’s victim blaming"

"Wh-what?”

(Source: dwightwho)

Forcing men to pay for women’s birth control is equality for everyone?

siryouarebeingmocked:

ipodiphoneirack:

manslator:

Manslation: I don’t understand feminism OR health insurance. Like, at all.

femslation: I want free stuff and if you complain about having to pay for it through taxes, you’re a misogynist.

I especially like how the OP doesn’t even pretend that they want to actually explain.

siryouarebeingmocked:

sjwstupidity:

icyarguments:

Nobody deserves harassment; except for those pesky anti-sjw blogs. But they’re obviously racist/sexist/transphobic so they deserve it.
Also I do cameos hello.

oh hello hi

Remember, folks, people have been harassed, doxxed, gotten death threats, and had fire alarms pulled on them just for talking about men’s issues and/or not agreeing with feminism. They’ve been accused of supporting everything from incest to terrorism. Heck, Gamergate has been called worse than ISIS by one journalist, and anti-GG folks have cheerfully thrown women and minorities under the bus when they disagreed with them.

poppypicklesticks:

pizzaotter:

thattallsummonerguy:

petitedovah:

nokiaofficial:

scalematecapekind:

howtfdidevrynamegettaken:

truestfeminist:

digital-joker:

I remember this…Chick got caught cheating on her bf so he put the child locks on the car and locked the girl inside with the roaches.

No woman deserves to go through this. I dont care if she was cheating, woman are allowed to express their sexuality and this is basically slut shaming. Her boyfriend was probably awful and abusive anyway.

Man cheats = emotionally abusive swine
Woman cheats = strong woman expressing her sexuality
Got that?

CHEATING IS FUCKING CHEATING. WHEN YOU ARE IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE, YOU DEVOTE YOUR LOVE AND SELF TO THEM AND ONLY THEM. IT’S NOT FUCKING ‘EXPRESSING SEXUALITY.’ IT’S A GODDAMN BETRAYAL OF TRUST NO MATTER WHO THR FUCK YOU ARE.

finally someone said it

Tumblr is full of bullshit. Bolding the truth. Jfc.

This whole post is just too great.


Seriously fuck that bitch.
It’s the least he could put her through after she betrays someones trust like that.

I bet if she had a boyfriend (lol) and he heated on her, she wouldn’t say “ummm he doesnt belong to me he is allowed to explore his sexuality outside of the relationship stop slut shaming him” 

poppypicklesticks:

pizzaotter:

thattallsummonerguy:

petitedovah:

nokiaofficial:

scalematecapekind:

howtfdidevrynamegettaken:

truestfeminist:

digital-joker:

I remember this…

Chick got caught cheating on her bf so he put the child locks on the car and locked the girl inside with the roaches.

No woman deserves to go through this. I dont care if she was cheating, woman are allowed to express their sexuality and this is basically slut shaming. Her boyfriend was probably awful and abusive anyway.

Man cheats = emotionally abusive swine

Woman cheats = strong woman expressing her sexuality

Got that?

CHEATING IS FUCKING CHEATING. WHEN YOU ARE IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE, YOU DEVOTE YOUR LOVE AND SELF TO THEM AND ONLY THEM. IT’S NOT FUCKING ‘EXPRESSING SEXUALITY.’ IT’S A GODDAMN BETRAYAL OF TRUST NO MATTER WHO THR FUCK YOU ARE.

finally someone said it

Tumblr is full of bullshit. Bolding the truth. Jfc.

This whole post is just too great.

Seriously fuck that bitch.

It’s the least he could put her through after she betrays someones trust like that.

I bet if she had a boyfriend (lol) and he heated on her, she wouldn’t say “ummm he doesnt belong to me he is allowed to explore his sexuality outside of the relationship stop slut shaming him” 

(via oppressing-all-womyns)

tuxedoandex:

lesliecrusher:

blanket apology to all the female celebrities i hated as a teenager because i was up to my eyeballs in internalized misogyny

Hating certain women =/= misogyny.

Hating certain BECAUSE they are women = misogyny.

If your hatred for them was not based on gender, you do not need to turn it into sexism.

(via oppressing-all-womyns)

qrieves:

uoa:

tinysquids:

toxicwinner:

me

I fucking quit

i hate art

"where’s your homework"

qrieves:

uoa:

tinysquids:

toxicwinner:

me

I fucking quit

i hate art

"where’s your homework"

(Source: thefakeoriginal, via bootycrusade)

oni-queen:

thestarjar:

Gravity Falls continues to insert ridiculous and obvious allusions to things Disney won’t allow

This is part of the reason why Gravity Falls rocks so much. Instead of fighting Disney, they pretty much mock it so much its become a joke. I love it.

(via bootycrusade)

pardonmewhileipanic:

BLESS THIS FUCKING CHILD OMG

(Source: meanplastic, via sherlockinfez)